View Poll Results: Does Stropping Speed Matter?

Voters
43. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes. The faster you strop, the better

    16 37.21%
  • No. Accuracy is more important

    27 62.79%
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 45
  1. #21
    ---
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,230
    Thanked: 278

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FloorPizza View Post
    I just found the following post by ben.mid today. The link he suggests is chock full of good info on stropping speed from AFDavis. ... http://straightrazorpalace.com/strop...xperiment.html
    Makes for interesting reading. I've been getting much better shaves recently and been putting it down to more stropping. But maybe I'm getting faster too?

    I think I need to upgrade my puny 12" Dovo strop to get some real speed going.

  2. #22
    Senior Member blabbermouth
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    2,516
    Thanked: 369

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick View Post
    Not sure I buy that Bart. I think the main contribution of speed in this context would be zero (static friction) or non-zero (kinetic friction). After that there may be some difference due to plastic deformation of the strop surface. If we imagine the strop surface to be pliable and bumpy then at a faster speed (same downforce) the razor may "skim" across the tops of the bumps rather than slower when the bumps have time to deform and flatten slightly. If there is any effect like this then going slower would result in more friction due to more surface area being in contact.
    And, what about the effect of speed on ~ razor wobble? Imagine a razor traveling from point A to B on a strop. Would going slowly increase the tendency (maybe mostly, or in part due to hand/ finger tension/ relaxation) for the razor to rock and shift (affecting equal pressure of razor against strop). Now imagine that same A to B path traveled at a much greater speed. Would the increased speed overcome the frequencies of rocking and wobbling and result in more even pressures and stropping forces?

    Does that make any sense to youse guys?


    Scott

  3. #23
    Member AFDavis11's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,726
    Thanked: 1486

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rajagra View Post
    Makes for interesting reading. I've been getting much better shaves recently and been putting it down to more stropping. But maybe I'm getting faster too?

    I think I need to upgrade my puny 12" Dovo strop to get some real speed going.
    Newbies strop slowly and get so-so shaves; Sr. Members strop quicker and get good shaves; coincidence?

    How did this poll get into the newbies corner anyway . . . all you guys should be stropping slowly and carefully!

    Don't listen to the old farts trying to corrupt you!

  4. #24
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    649
    Thanked: 77

    Default

    I understand what you're saying... but I don't have a clue as to the effect or non-effect of it. I was thinking that a wobble or vibration might increase with speed. In both frequency and force.


    Jees, if you hit a harmonic you might have a strop blowout (just kidding on that last part. I have no idea how these things come into my mind).

  5. #25
    Member AFDavis11's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,726
    Thanked: 1486

    Default

    Its the harmonics that strop all your 4/8 and 3/8 razors at the same time.

  6. #26
    Life is short, filled with Stuff joke1176's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Columbia, MO
    Posts
    1,394
    Thanked: 231

    Default

    I voted for the doesn't matter choice, because I think technique trumps speed for results... but you still need some speed to get good results anyhow.

  7. #27
    what Dad calls me nun2sharp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Kansas city area USA
    Posts
    9,172
    Thanked: 1677

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by joke1176 View Post
    I voted for the doesn't matter choice, because I think technique trumps speed for results... but you still need some speed to get good results anyhow.
    +1 technique and speed are complimentary.
    It is easier to fool people than to convince them they have been fooled. Twain

  8. #28
    BHAD cured Sticky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,306
    Thanked: 230

    Default

    I vote yes; going as fast as accuracy will allow. Faster definitely feels and sounds different on the strop.

  9. #29
    The original Skolor and Gentileman. gugi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    17,410
    Thanked: 3906
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Ok, I've got my own number - I don't vote.

    It's interesting what happens to the edge at various speeds, and short of one of these slo-mo cameras I think it may be hard to figure it out.

    But my theory is that at faster speeds the pressure on the edge is more uniform.
    To use an old example from when Fermi was figuring out the nuclear bomb, it's like a golf ball - at high speed it just goes over the hole, not having time to sink into it. So you'd want your neutrons slow and your strop bumps fast.

    I was ready to post on the friction being less, but somebody else has been also paying attention in physics class.

  10. #30
    Member Sunbane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    42
    Thanked: 3

    Default

    This is a great thread. Thanks for posting it FP!


  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Sunbane For This Useful Post:

    FloorPizza (01-23-2009)

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •